AustLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

Australian Indigenous Law Reporter

Australian Indigenous Law Reporter (AILR)
You are here:  AustLII >> Databases >> Australian Indigenous Law Reporter >> 2003 >> [2003] AUIndigLawRpr 12

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Articles | Noteup | LawCite | Help

Editors --- "Guidelines for Ethical Research in Indigenous Studies - Digest" [2003] AUIndigLawRpr 12; (2003) 8(1) Australian Indigenous Law Reporter 85


Policy and Procedure - Australia

Guidelines for Ethical Research in Indigenous Studies

The Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait islander Studies

Canberra

May 2000

Introduction

It is essential that Indigenous peoples are participants in any research project that concerns them, to achieve a shared understanding of the aims and methods of the research, and to share in the results of this work. The Institute’s Guidelines for Ethical Research in Indigenous Studies express the principles of ethical research in Indigenous studies and are founded on respect for Indigenous peoples’ inherent right to self-determination, and to control and maintain their culture and heritage. The Institute considers that these principles are not only a matter of ethical research practice but of human rights.

Ms Erica-Irene Daes, Chairperson Rapporteur of the United Nations Working Group on Indigenous Populations, remarked[1] that:

Heritage can never be alienated, surrendered or sold, except for conditional use. Sharing therefore creates a relationship between the givers and receivers of knowledge. The givers retain the authority to ensure that knowledge is used properly and the receivers continue to recognize and repay the gift.

At every stage, research with and about Indigenous peoples must be founded on a process of meaningful engagement and reciprocity between the researcher and the Indigenous people.

It is important that the Institute’s Guidelines for Ethical Research in Indigenous Studies embody the best standards of ethical research and human rights. To this end, the Institute’s Council initiated a review of the 1985 Guidelines. The Institute’s Ethics Committee, together with the Research staff of the Institute held two workshops in 1999 to develop the new Guidelines, which were then redrafted by the Research staff.

In compiling the Guidelines consideration was given to recent significant research in this area, including, The Australian Research Council, Commissioned Report No. 59, Research of Interest to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples, prepared by the Institute; Our Culture: Our Future, Report on Australian Indigenous Cultural and Intellectual property Rights, prepared by Terri Janke of Michael Frankel and Company, for the Institute and ATSIC; and the recent National Health and Medical Research Council, ‘National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Research Involving Humans’.

These Guidelines are primarily intended for research sponsored by the Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies. However, the Institute recognises that it has responsibility as a leading institution in Australian Indigenous studies and recognises that its ethical guidelines inform all research in this area.

The Guidelines include a statement of the principles of ethical research in Indigenous studies, followed by an explanation of each principle, accompanied by some practical applications. These practical points are not intended to be directive but are recommendations and suggestions to achieve the best standards of ethical research.

Principles of Ethical Research

A. Consultation, Negotiation and Mutual Understanding

1. Consultation, negotiation and free and informed consent are the foundations for research with or about Indigenous peoples.

Researchers must accept a degree of Indigenous community input into and control of the research process. This also recognises the obligation on researchers give something back to the community.

It is ethical practice in any research on Indigenous issues to include consultation with people who may be directly affected by the research or research outcomes whether or not the research involves fieldwork.

2. The responsibility for consultation and negotiation is ongoing.

Consultation and negotiation is a continuous two-way process. Ongoing consultation is necessary to ensure free and informed consent for the proposed research, and of maintaining that consent.

Research projects should be staged to allow continuing opportunities for consideration of the research by the community.

3. Consultation and negotiation should achieve mutual understanding about the proposed research.

Consultation involves an honest exchange of information about aims, methods, and potential outcomes (for all parties). Consultation should not be considered as merely an opportunity for researchers to tell the community what they, the researchers, may want.

Being properly and fully informed about the aims and methods of a research project, its implications and potential outcomes, allows groups to decide for themselves whether to oppose or to embrace the project.

B. Respect, Recognition and Involvement

4. Indigenous knowledge systems and processes must be respected.

Acknowledging and respecting Indigenous knowledge systems and processes is not only a matter of courtesy but also recognition that such knowledge can make a significant contribution to the research process.

Researchers must respect the cultural property rights of Indigenous peoples in relation to knowledge, ideas, cultural expressions and cultural materials.

5. There must be recognition of the diversity and uniqueness of peoples as well as of individuals.

Research in Indigenous studies must show an appreciation of the diversity of Indigenous peoples, who have different languages, cultures, histories and perspectives.

It is also important to recognise the diversity of individuals and groups within those communities.

6. The intellectual and cultural property rights of Indigenous peoples must be respected and preserved.

Indigenous cultural and intellectual property rights are part of the heritage that exists in the cultural practices, resources and knowledge systems of Indigenous peoples, and that are passed on by them in expressing their cultural identity.

Indigenous intellectual property is not static and extends to things that may be created based on that heritage.[2]

It is a fundamental principle of research to acknowledge the sources of information and those who have contributed to the research.

7. Indigenous researchers, individuals and communities should be involved in research as collaborators.

Indigenous communities and individuals have a right to be involved in any research project focussed upon them and their culture.

Participants have the right to withdraw from the project at any time.

Research on Indigenous issues should also incorporate Indigenous perspectives and this is often most effectively achieved by facilitating more direct involvement in the research.

C. Benefits, Outcomes and Agreement

8. The use of, and access to, research results should be agreed.

Indigenous peoples make a significant contribution to research by providing knowledge, resources or access to data. That contribution should be acknowledged through providing access to research results and negotiating rights in the research at an early stage.

The community’s expectations, the planned outcomes, and access to research results should be in agreement.

9. A researched community should benefit from, and not be disadvantaged by, the research project.

Research in Indigenous studies should benefit Indigenous peoples at a local level, and more generally.

A reciprocal benefit should accrue for their allowing researchers often intimate access to their personal and community knowledge.

10. The negotiation of outcomes should include results specific to the needs of the researched community.

Among the tangible benefits that a community should be able to expect from a research project is the provision of research results in a form that is useful and accessible.

11. Negotiation should result in a formal agreement for the conduct of a research project, based on good faith and free and informed consent.

The aim of the negotiation process is to come to a clear understanding, which results in a formal agreement (preferably written), about research intentions, methods and potential results.

The establishment of agreements and protocols between Indigenous peoples and researchers is an important development in Indigenous studies.[3]

Good faith negotiations are those that have involved a full and frank disclosure of all available information and that were entered into with an honest view to reaching an agreement.

Free and informed consent means that agreement must be obtained free of duress or pressure and fully cognisant of the details, and risks of the proposed research. Informed consent of the people as a group, as well as individuals within that group, is important.

Guidelines for Implementation of Principles of Ethical Research

NOTE: The various points will not necessarily apply in all cases.

1. Consultation, negotiation and free and informed consent are the foundations for research with or about indigenous peoples

Researchers must accept a degree of Indigenous community input into and control of the research process. This also recognises the obligation on researchers give something back to the community.

It is ethical practice in any research on Indigenous issues to include consultation with people who may be directly affected by the research or research outcomes whether or not the research involves fieldwork.

Research concerning Indigenous peoples should be carried out with appropriate consultation about the aims and objectives and meaningful negotiation of processes, outcomes and involvement. Relevant communities and individuals should be involved at all stages of the research process, from formulating projects and methods to determining research outcomes and interpreting results.[4]

To facilitate appropriate consultation, negotiation and free and informed consent:

Also:

2. The responsibility for consultation and negotiation is ongoing.

Consultation and negotiation is a continuous two-way process. Ongoing consultation is necessary to ensure free and informed consent for the proposed research, and of maintaining that consent.

Research projects should be staged to allow continuing opportunities for consideration of the research by the community.

Community representatives, individual participants and the wider Indigenous community may need time to consider a proposed research project and to discuss its implications, both before it begins and at various stages of the project:

3. Consultation and negotiation should achieve mutual understanding about the proposed research.

Consultation involves an honest exchange of information about aims, methods, and potential outcomes (for all parties). Consultation should not be considered as merely an opportunity for researchers to tell the community what they, the researchers, may want.

Being properly and fully informed about the aims and methods of a research project, its implications and potential outcomes, allows groups to decide for themselves whether to oppose or to embrace the project.

Obtaining agreement to conduct research with or about Indigenous peoples involves fully informing the community about the proposal, discussing the research and negotiating how the research is to proceed:

Remember:

4. Indigenous knowledge systems and processes must be respected.

Acknowledging and respecting Indigenous knowledge systems and processes is not only a matter of courtesy but also recognition that such knowledge can make a significant contribution to the research process.

Researchers must respect the cultural property rights of Indigenous peoples in relation to knowledge, ideas, cultural expressions and cultural materials.

Where the knowledge of an individual or a group forms the basis of or contributes significantly to research, the importance of that contribution should be reflected in the reporting of research:

5. There must be recognition of the diversity and uniqueness of peoples as well as of individuals

Research in Indigenous studies must show an appreciation of the diversity of Indigenous peoples, who have different languages, cultures, histories and perspectives.

It is also important to recognise the diversity of individuals and groups within those communities.

Researchers should recognise the diversity of Indigenous individual groups and communities and the implications in planning carrying out and reporting their research:

6. The intellectual and cultural property rights of Indigenous peoples should be respected and preserved.

Indigenous cultural and intellectual property rights are part of the heritage that exists in the cultural practices, resources and knowledge systems of Indigenous peoples, and that are passed on by them in expressing their cultural identity.

Indigenous intellectual property is not static and extends to things that may be created based on that heritage.[8]

It is a fundamental principle of research to acknowledge the sources of information and those who have contributed to the research.

Continuing Indigenous ownership of the cultural and intellectual property rights in the materials on which the research is based should be recognised and acknowledged in the design of a research project:

7. Indigenous researchers, individuals and communities should be involved in research as collaborators.

Indigenous communities and individuals have a right to be involved in any research project focussed upon them and their culture.

Participants have the right to withdraw from the project at any time.

Research on Indigenous issues should also incorporate Indigenous perspectives and this is often most effectively achieved by facilitating more direct involvement in the research.

Researchers should facilitate direct involvement of Indigenous researchers and community members in their research:

8. The use of, and access to, research results should be agreed.

Indigenous peoples make a significant contribution to research by providing knowledge, resources or access to data. That contribution should be acknowledged through providing access to research results and negotiating rights in the research at an early stage.

The community’s expectations, the planned outcomes, and access to research results should be in agreement.

The rights to, the forms and presentation of, individual or community use of, and access to, research results should be agreed:

9. A researched community should benefit from, and not be disadvantaged by, the research project.

Research in Indigenous studies should benefit Indigenous peoples at a local level, and more generally.

A reciprocal benefit should accrue for their allowing researchers often intimate access to their personal and community knowledge.

There should be benefits to the community for participation in research:

10. The negotiation of outcomes should include results specific to the needs of the researched community.

Among the tangible benefits that a community should be able to expect from a research project is the provision of research results in a form that is useful and accessible.

Researchers should be aware that research outcomes of interest to Indigenous peoples, and any community that is directly involved, may differ from those envisaged by the researcher:

11. Negotiation should result in a formal agreement for the conduct of a research project, based on good faith and free and informed consent.

The aim of the negotiation process is to come to a clear understanding, which results in a formal agreement (preferably written), about research intentions, methods and potential results.

The establishment of agreements and protocols between Indigenous peoples and researchers is an important development in Indigenous studies.[9]

Good faith negotiations are those that have involved a full and frank disclosure of all available information and that were entered into with an honest view to reaching an agreement.

Free and informed consent means that agreement must be obtained free of duress or pressure and fully cognisant of the details, and risks of the proposed research. Informed consent of the people as a group, as well as individuals within that group, is important.

Where practical, a written agreement (a ‘protocol’, or ‘memorandum of understanding’ or ‘contract’) should be the end result of the consultation and negotiation, to protect the community and the researcher and to clarify the understandings that have been reached. Such agreements may have legal implications and consideration should be given to whether independent legal advice is required:

Also:

References and Further Reading

AIATSIS. 1999. Research of Interest to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples. Australian Research Council. National Board of Employment, Education and Training, Canberra (Commissioned Report 59) (especially: ‘Chapter 4. The Ethics of Research’) [On line:] http://www.arc.gov.au/publications/arc_pubs/99-05_ATSI_report59.pdf

ATSIC. 1997. Protocols for undertaking research relating to, involving and about Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission, Canberra (reprinted: AIATSIS 1999: Appendix 2B)

Eades, Sandra J., Anne W. Read and the Bibbulung Gnarneep Team. 1999. The Bibbulung Gnarneep project: practical implementation of guidelines on ethics in Indigenous health research. Medical Journal of Australia 170:433-436.

Janke, Terri. 1999. Our Culture: Our future. Report on Australian Indigenous cultural and intellectual property rights. Prepared for AIATSIS and ATSIC. Michael Frankel & Company, Sydney [On line:] http://www.icip.lawnet.com.au/

Langfield, Michele (ed.). 1999. A Question of Ethics: Personal Perspectives. The History Institute, Victoria.

National Health and Medical Research Council. 1999. National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Research Involving Humans. Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra [On line:] http://www.health.gov.au/nhmrc/ethics/statemen.htm

Ngalia Heritage Research Council. N.d. Ethical Research Guidelines for Researchers and Consultants. Typescript, 5pp.


ENDNOTE[S]

1 Erica-Irene Daes, ‘Discrimination against Indigenous peoples: Study on the protection of the cultural and intellectual property of Indigenous peoples’, paper presented to the 45th session of the Commission on Human Rights, Economic and Social Council, United Nations, New York, 1993, p. 9.

[2] Janke 1999: xvii.

[3] For examples of research agreements used by Indigenous organisations, governments and funding agencies, and developed by researchers and Indigenous community members, see AIATSIS 1999: Chapter 4: ‘The Ethics of Research’, and Appendix 3: ‘Ethics guidelines, sample protocols’.

[4] ATSIC 1997:4.

[5] ‘Heritage protection, intellectual property rights, and ownership of cultural material should not be considered to be lost by those individuals and communities who are able to demonstrate a traditional claim to that cultural heritage’ (ATSIC 1997:3).

[6] ‘Any person who trespasses on indigenous land risks endangering not only themselves, but also the traditional land owners who have the obligation to protect the sacredness and integrity of their country’ (ATSIC 1997:2).

[7] ‘Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples have distinctive languages, customs, spirituality, perspectives and understandings, deriving from their cultures and histories. Research that has indigenous experience as its subject matter must reflect those perspectives and understandings’ (ATSIC 1997:2).

[8] Janke 1999: xvii.

[9] For examples of research agreements used by Indigenous organisations, governments and funding agencies, and developed by researchers and Indigenous community members, see AIATSIS 1999: Chapter 4: ‘The Ethics of Research’, and Appendix 3: ‘Ethics guidelines, sample protocols’.


AustLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/AUIndigLawRpr/2003/12.html