AustLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

Australian Indigenous Law Reporter

Australian Indigenous Law Reporter (AILR)
You are here:  AustLII >> Databases >> Australian Indigenous Law Reporter >> 2005 >> [2005] AUIndigLawRpr 83

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Articles | Noteup | LawCite | Author Info | Download | Help

Editors --- "Joint Statement by Papuan Religious Leaders - Digest" [2005] AUIndigLawRpr 83; (2005) 9(4) Australian Indigenous Law Reporter 120


JOINT STATEMENT BY PAPUAN RELIGIOUS LEADERS

Jayapura, West Papua

15 September 2005

1. We, 87 religious leaders from all parts of Papua (comprising 20 Protestants, 23 Catholics, 22 Muslim, 11 Hindus and 11 Buddhists), regard this workshop for the International Day of Peace, held in Jayapura from 11 to 15 September, as a remarkable and valuable experience. We have enjoyed a sense of togetherness and solidarity throughout the workshop. We have been enriched by the series of reflections, the sharing of opinions and experiences, and the many discussions that have been held over these four days. This workshop – with the theme of ‘Religions as Agents of Justice and Peace’ – has helped us to better familiarise ourselves with the various issues of concern in Papua today and given us hope in our efforts to make Papua a land of peace.

Issues of Common Concern

In order to make Papua a land of peace, there are a number of concerns that must be addressed. As religious leaders of Papua, we highlight these below:

2. We are concerned about the suspicion between people of different faiths. There is a lack of religious understanding and sincerity of faith within our religious communities. People also have poor knowledge of religions other than their own. There is a lack of communication and coordination within and between faiths. We note with concern the tendency to exploit religion for political purposes and theological conflict created by government policy that is not in the spirit of rights to religious freedom afforded by the Indonesian Constitution. We are concerned about discrimination in the provision of public services to religious minorities (on a national level), and the lack of recognition for those faiths that represent a majority of the population in regional areas.

3. In relation to law and human rights, we see how the law is ‘sold off’ to the highest bidder, the human rights of Papuans have been neglected, customary rights have not been upheld and those in positions of power enjoy impunity from prosecution.

4. In relation to economic affairs, we are concerned with the fact that theft and destruction of natural resources is rife, and that there was no real commitment to promote development in Papua. We see that a people-centered economy has not been developed and the majority poor community have been economically disempowered. The provision of economic facilities and infrastructure is not fair.

5. In relation to the state of education in Papua, we are concerned by the prevalence of falsified degrees and qualifications. There has been insufficient effort to develop a school curriculum relevant to local cultures. The welfare of teachers is poor, and there is a low standard of teacher training and skills. School textbooks are not properly distributed to village areas and there is a low level of support from the government and education foundations for the development of the education sector in Papua.

6. With respect to the health sector, we are concerned about the poor availability of drugs, particularly in remote areas and the lack of medical personnel in villages. We are concerned about the poor terms and conditions for medical personnel, low standards of service, the lack of health equipment and facilities, as well as the insufficient funding for the community health sector. We are also worried about the poor awareness among the community of health issues, the high child and maternal death rates, the spread of HIV/AIDS, and the low level of family welfare.

7. We are concerned about the fact that social problems, including alcohol abuse, domestic violence and child neglect, have not been given the serious attention they require. We are concerned by the lack of tolerance for difference among the community. Social facilities and infrastructure are also inadequate.

8. With respect to politics and the state of governance in Papua, we are concerned about the fact the community regards politics as corrupt. We see how the law is compromised to serve the interests of particular people or groups. There is a tendency for politics to create divisions within the community, a prevalence of money politics, and the weakness of democracy given the failure to fully involve the people in decision-making. The culture of corruption is also of concern. We see that good and clean governance has not been achieved. Customary communities, faith communities and women have not been given a place in the development process. We have witnessed ourselves how Special Autonomy has failed to improve the plight of Papuan communities.

Shared Hopes

Faced with these concerns, we also find many sources of hope with respect to efforts to make Papua a land of peace:

9. In interfaith relations, we recognise the good relations among faith leaders. We appreciate the contribution of interfaith communication and prayers, forums for communication among faith leaders, as well as dialogue between religious leaders and joint prayers to prevent conflict. We recognise the independence of each of our respective religions, the support of religious communities for their leaders, and solid leadership.

10. With respect to the law and human rights, faith leaders support efforts to uphold the rule of law. We undertake human rights education within the community and support all efforts to promote respect for human dignity. We work together to speak out on issues of justice and peace.

11. In relation to the economy, we recognise that there are promising human resources and undertake education for community-based economic empowerment. We strive to ensure that the people are made the actors in the process of development, work to strengthen the bargaining position of the community-based economy; and prepare people to be actively involved in economic activities.

12. In the education sector, religions have long been active agents in education and skills development in Papua. Religions have established many schools, particularly in remote areas, and have developed and maintained a dormitory system that is cross-cultural. We have undertaken a ‘civilising’ education based on traditional culture, sought to promote greater participation in education among the community and undertaken education for character building.

13. In the health sector, religions lead, build and promote services – and prayers – to improve health for the community. Religions help improve the nutritional intake of mothers and children, promote ‘pro-life’, conduct health clinics, educate communities about HIV/AIDS and other infectious diseases, and campaign for healthy lifestyles.

14. In the social sphere, religions inform of the strength inherent in our social diversity, stress the interdependence of people for community well-being, promote social welfare (through orphanages and skills development for youth), seek to address social ailments, and promote community spirit.

15. In relation to politics and governance, religions have a particular bargaining position. Religions act as a ‘safety belt’ and build unity. We stress the importance of ethics in decision making, as well as the importance of employing peaceful means and upholding human dignity in addressing problems.

Our Joint Commitment and Appeal

16. As religious leaders, we are committed to make Papua a land of peace:

17. We invite and encourage all people in the land of Papua to:

18. We support and encourage the central and regional governments to:

The full text of this document is available online at <http://www.ciir.org/Templates/AssociatesInternal.asp?NodeID=91756> .


AustLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/AUIndigLawRpr/2005/83.html