Paper Stats:
Abstract Views: 3804
Downloads: 1165
Download Rank: 533
ROCHELLE COOPER DREYFUSS
New York University School of Law
March 2000
NYU Law School, Public Law and Legal Theory Working Paper No. 17
Abstract:
This article examines business method patenting. After describing State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. Signature Financial Group, Inc., the Federal Circuit's 1998 decision recognizing business method patents, I discuss the problems arising from extending patent law to the business environment. First, I show why many invalid patents are likely to issue. Second, I review the rationales for intellectual property protection and demonstrate why none are relevant to business methods. Third, I argue that business model patenting can distort competition by insulating inefficient business operations. Because of network effects and lock in, these inefficiencies?and the resulting distortion?can persist even if the patent is later invalidated.
The last part of the article suggests that patents should be permitted on the software that implements business methods, but not cover business models themselves. Such an approach would better accord with core intellectual property doctrine, which permits protection for instantiations of principles (expression in the case of copyright; applications in the case of patents), but not protection for the principles themselves. This approach would also withhold protection from business methods that do not require the special incentives of patent protection and it would focus both the PTO and the courts on the inventiveness of the software rather than the clever idea of transferring real-world business models (such as the Dutch auction protected by the Priceline patent) into cyberspace. Most important, if patent protection were to run only to software and not to the model the software implements, then others would be able to utilize the model with different software (or without software). Thus, distortive impacts on the competitive marketplace would largely be eliminated.
Accepted Paper Series
Abstract has been viewed 3804 times
Go to Download Document Button to download paper from the SSRN Electronic Paper Collection
Contact Information for ROCHELLE COOPER DREYFUSS (Contact Author)
Email address for ROCHELLE COOPER DREYFUSS
New York University School of Law
40 Washington Square South
New York , NY 10012-1099
United States
212-998-6258 (Phone)
212-995-4760 (Fax)
Suggested Citation
Dreyfuss, Rochelle Cooper, "Are Business Method Patents Bad for Business?" (March 2000). Santa Clara Computer & High Technology Law Journal, Vol. 16(2) http://ssrn.com/abstract=219574
SSRN Electronic Paper Collection
If you are experiencing download difficulties, click here
If you cannot download or receive this paper through email, please contact Support@SSRN.Com.
Format Type |
Number of |
Date Posted |
File Size |
Est. download time |
File name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Acrobat File |
1165 |
Mar 31, 2000 |
269K | 2.25 minutes |
000330651.pdf |
Download times are estimates only. Your time to download may be extended due to a poor connection or heavy internet traffic between your location and our servers.
SSRN Resources
To search for other abstracts in the SSRN archival database, click here.
To order a membership to an SSRN Network or to subscribe to one or more of SSRN's journals, go to our online subscription request form.
To go to SSRN's main web site (www.ssrn.com), click here.