SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions
  go to Document Delivery
  Paper Stats:
   Abstract Views: 60
   Downloads: 0
The WTO`s First Antitrust Case - Mexican Telecom: A Sleeping Victory for Trade and Competition

Affiliation Unknown

Journal of International Economic Law, Vol. 9, Issue 2, pp. 271-292, 2006
A World Trade Organization (WTO) dispute panel has decided the WTO`s first antitrust case. It resolved the matter in favour of the United States` claim that Mexico had anticompetitively facilitated exploitative prices and a cartel that raised the price of terminating cross-border telephone calls in Mexico and thereby harmed trade and competition. The case is Mexico - Measures Affecting Telecommunications Services (April 2004) (`the Mexican telecom case`). This essay argues that if the WTO`s antitrust clause was in fact triggered (which is a point of contention), Mexico`s conduct violated its obligations. Furthermore, it argues that the GATS antitrust obligation in the telecommunications sector should be acknowledged as occupying an important place at the intersection of trade, competition and industrial policies. Antitrust law is the other side of the coin of liberal trade law. Antitrust law opens markets by prohibiting private and other commercial restraints, while trade law opens markets by prohibiting public restraints. Before Mexican telecom, no legal discipline was regarded as copious or flexible enough to address combined public and private restraints. In particular, nations were allowed free rein to privilege national champions that harmed competition in and out of their country, imposing costs on outsiders as well as on their own people. A positive reading of the antitrust clause helps to fill the gap.

Accepted Paper Series

Suggested Citation
Fox, r M., "The WTO`s First Antitrust Case - Mexican Telecom: A Sleeping Victory for Trade and Competition" (June 2006). Journal of International Economic Law, Vol. 9, Issue 2, pp. 271-292, 2006 Available at SSRN:

Export in: Export What's this?


Contact Information for R M. FOX (Contact Author)

(No e-mail address available for R M. FOX
Affiliation Unknown
No Address Available


SSRN Electronic Paper Collection

Add to
Shopping Cart
Email Abstract or
Add to
My Briefcase


If you are experiencing download difficulties, click here.

This is a Oxford University Press (04-2550) paper. Oxford University Press (04-2550) charges $38.00 for this paper.


Format Type

Number of Downloads


File Size

File name

Acrobat File


Jul 08, 2006




Get Acrobat Reader
  The latest version of Adobe Acrobat Reader or Adobe Acrobat is required to view this paper. To obtain your free copy, click on the Acrobat button.
SSRN Resources
To search for other abstracts in the SSRN archival database, click here.

To order a membership to an SSRN Network or to subscribe to one or more of SSRN's journals, go to our online subscription request form.

To go to SSRN's main web site (, click here.

© 2006 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use
This page was served by hermes 1 in 0.30 seconds.